Talking to these same self-entitled family members about my newly discovered lot in life (as a targeted individual (TI)) can tend to be comical at times, if it were not such a very serious subject with such serious repercussions. The first question that invariably comes up is:
1. What makes you think you're so important that anyone would invest that much time and effort harassing you?
Little do these people know that that is the very first question a TI asks themself when they become aware of this activity. Trying to explain that to people is near to impossible. To them you're just a bit too serious, touchy, sensitive, paranoid, and a host of other adjectives. We all have our idiosyncratic way of handling things, so why are so many people now complaining about this same type of scenario in their lives? If it's just a figment of our own personal (and possibly faulty) way of thinking, why are all the stories about this from all walks of life so similar?
The bad thing is that this can break families apart in argument when TIs are told "just get over it--let it roll off your shoulders, don't be so sensitive." Realistically, how can a TI just get over it, let it roll off our shoulders like water on the back of the proverbial duck, and not be sensitive to the fact that these perps are actually being successful in having you removed from job after job, are able to prevent you from finding work, and are interfering with your family, work, and personal relationships, when the only thing you (the TI) are doing is making sure you are at work everyday and producing like you're supposed to, providing for yourself and your family, and trying to have a little fun and recreation in life to assuage some of the trouble that is being caused for you?
This is when family members (probably unknowingly) make matters worse for the TI. My question to people like this is: How can a person who has had no mental or emotional problems in the past (except for the occasional light depression that all of us experience from time to time) suddenly start talking very coherently about what they are experiencing and then experience having the ones who are supposed to be the closest and most caring people in your life make sweeping judgments about your (the TI's) mental faculties? Wouldn't it behoove those who really care to at least listen with some degree of believability to what is being described? Haven't these types of things actually happened in real life to people in other countries? For example, the Stasi and Red Guard infiltrations in Russia, East Germany and Poland in the past? These things were perpetrated upon normal everyday citizens. It was done as a way to silence people and instill fear in the population. There is evidence that this is what we are experiencing here now in our country--yet people still cannot get their minds around this--the thought is "No, not here in the US, can't be. It's just you. You're overstressed and just need some rest." I wish that were the case--because the past two years of unemployment should have given me a substantial rest from all this--but it hasn't. It continues, and like the perps have said, I have this to look forward to until the day I die--or this rotten system ends, whichever is first.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Social Security--Will It Be Next?
As stated earlier, in the economic environment we're all struggling through, finding a job can be a more than full-time endeavor itself, and made even harder by perps who think that sabotaging someone's job searches is laughable.
So what does one do when unemployment is exhausted and no job to be found? The answer is obvious--there are tent cities in California and all over the US right now that are the direct result of our present economic climate, and this GS phenomenon only adds to their population.
I hate to even bring this up, but what is next? Is Social Security going to be the next thing to disappear in front of our eyes? I have asked a couple of family members about this, and they tend to think it won't happen in their lifetime. This answer would be fine (however short-sighted it is) except that the attitude of self-entitlement that usually goes with that statement is a little hard to take. Being a generation behind them, I have worked more recently to help provide them with these entitlements, just as my children will be providing my benefits when the time comes (if the time comes). More and more our Social Security funding is being raided, and I have even read that one of our recent presidents (and I think you all know who I am talking about) has even left it in the red. How true that is, I don't know--we peasants who do the work are not privy to these things.
For those of us who have not reached the legal age limit to receive these "entitlements", the uppity attitude of those who are receiving these benefits adds to the frustration we feel at having no recourse but to buy (if we can even afford it) a tent and join the millions of homeless out there with no place to go--I always wanted to try camping anyway. "From cradle to grave" I've learned the art of making lemonade when being presented with lemons. This would just be another instance of that--and it would give me a larger audience to do the preaching work we are known for--add a little sugar to take awake the sour, and, once more, voila! lemonade.
So, what would happen if Soc Sec suddenly wasn't there anymore? I hate to even think about it, but I know it would wake up a whole new segment of the population who have never done completely without before. The sad part is it will affect the very old and very sick and those who care for them.
Really, I'm being way too cavalier here in this post. Is it because in my own mind, even I (a TI) might still think it would never happen in my lifetime? Stay tuned.
So what does one do when unemployment is exhausted and no job to be found? The answer is obvious--there are tent cities in California and all over the US right now that are the direct result of our present economic climate, and this GS phenomenon only adds to their population.
I hate to even bring this up, but what is next? Is Social Security going to be the next thing to disappear in front of our eyes? I have asked a couple of family members about this, and they tend to think it won't happen in their lifetime. This answer would be fine (however short-sighted it is) except that the attitude of self-entitlement that usually goes with that statement is a little hard to take. Being a generation behind them, I have worked more recently to help provide them with these entitlements, just as my children will be providing my benefits when the time comes (if the time comes). More and more our Social Security funding is being raided, and I have even read that one of our recent presidents (and I think you all know who I am talking about) has even left it in the red. How true that is, I don't know--we peasants who do the work are not privy to these things.
For those of us who have not reached the legal age limit to receive these "entitlements", the uppity attitude of those who are receiving these benefits adds to the frustration we feel at having no recourse but to buy (if we can even afford it) a tent and join the millions of homeless out there with no place to go--I always wanted to try camping anyway. "From cradle to grave" I've learned the art of making lemonade when being presented with lemons. This would just be another instance of that--and it would give me a larger audience to do the preaching work we are known for--add a little sugar to take awake the sour, and, once more, voila! lemonade.
So, what would happen if Soc Sec suddenly wasn't there anymore? I hate to even think about it, but I know it would wake up a whole new segment of the population who have never done completely without before. The sad part is it will affect the very old and very sick and those who care for them.
Really, I'm being way too cavalier here in this post. Is it because in my own mind, even I (a TI) might still think it would never happen in my lifetime? Stay tuned.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Blacklisting--Is It Really Happening To People?
The open threat made to me at one workplace was done using something called "Directed Conversation". This is a type of group conversation done in a loud enough way for someone to hear what is being said, yet elements of the conversation will only be understood by a TI to personally pertain to them by either the way the conversation is directed, or words or phrases previously used by a targeted or monitored person (either in a monitored phone or personal conversation) are repeated in such a way to show that the conversation is indeed being directed to a certain targeted individual. Most people are familiar with this being used in a benign and joking way when people who are familiar with one another (like a husband and wife or good friends) mimic a comment one or the other makes and then loudly repeats the information to others in the room knowing that their spouse or friend can hear them--it's done in fun and no harm is meant.
This technique is also used by perps to let TIs know that some tidbit of information has been found out about them (usually by coerced means) or to let TIs know what they can next expect in the way of harassment. Because only the TI is aware of what is happening, others, although they can hear that something is going on, are not tuned into it (except for the fact that it is usually done in a very loud or disruptive manner so that it can be heard across a room for example), so others are most likely not listening and are absorbed in their own activities. The perps will insert any little personal aspects into this usually loud conversation they can to make the TI aware that the conversation is meant for them. But whether the conversation is heard and understood by others or not, the TI will be the one who understands why it is happening. This is not done for fun, but is done to unnerve someone, to again let the TI know that they are under a constant state of harassment, that their personal information and life are being violated for the umpteenth time in a day or week, and that it is not going to stop. If the perps or the group involved in this activity are approached by the TI or even by a sympathetic supervisor to make the disruption stop, the perps will deny that anything was being said about the particular person complaining and make it plain to whoever is listening and observing that the TI (and the supervisor) is either, at the very least, "a bit too touchy" or, at worst ,"totally paranoid."
This makes it almost impossible for TIs to be able to go through supervisory channels to make this kind of thing stop, and TIs who try to handle it alone directly with the perps only leads to an office argument (a disruptive spectacle in the workplace for everyone else to observe and report to management or HR). Most perps who engage in this type of activity are very adept at playing innocent after doing these kinds of things to someone. It just adds to the blame and humiliation being heaped upon someone they choose to target.
I was told in this way at one job that I "would never work again". So is it possible to blacklist a person so that any subsequent job search will come up negative? I used to think not. But I've changed my thoughts on this because of two things:
1. The extent I've personally seen to which these perps will go to ruin a person's life and character (I've seen it done to others as well as myself).
2. And that there is not only positive networking that job searchers engage in to find work, but there is also negative networking that companies engage in to get the supposedly "right" people hired (let's hire this person because they are a friend of a friend of a friend, not because they are a reliable and hard worker--that's how these activities take hold in a company environment, when perps can get their perp associates hired at the same company, and preferably in management positions where hiring decisions are made--I've seen it numerous times). Another scenario experienced at one company recently was when one TI did successfully obtain a job, perps somehow gained access into the doors while employees clocked into the entrance, made bogus 911 calls to police and the fire department reporting bogus illegal and emergency activities, causing the police and other emergency vehicles to arrive only to search the building to find nothing wrong. This kept up for a good couple of weeks. The directors of the company in an effort to quell what was happening employed a security company (of perps) to install further security equipment (at expense to the company) and hire security guards (perps) to watch over the buildings to make sure this did not happen again. This only served to put the perps exactly where they needed to be (inside the company's buildings) to be able to keep their TI under surveillance more easily--another instance of "Problem, Reaction, Solution"--foment a problem, whip up a reaction of outrage from the observers, and provide the solution to the problem (and get paid for it besides).
I'm convinced even more now that it IS possible for blacklisting to occur, because in today's economic environment, if you don't already know someone in the company, your chances of getting hired are slim, and are even slimmer if you've had words on the job with these perps (or their network of people they know in other companies) in defense of your own character when being subjected to the innuendo and gossip they spread.
It's still not known to what extent most companies purposely engage in this kind of thing, but one particular incident has led me to believe it is not only possible but very probable in the case of some TIs.
Here is what happened:
I had applied to a well-known department store as a cashier (something I've had previous experience at). I had given several personal references to the fact that I had done that type of work before. When I arrived at my scheduled interview, I was told that I would be next and was sitting in the waiting room (which was next to one of the cashier checkout areas). While waiting, a very loud conversation between two men (one a male cashier and the other a customer who was "checking out") began taking place. The customer had arrived only a few minutes earlier. Close by was one of the hiring supervisors, so the conversation was loud enough to be heard by everyone in the waiting room. The conversation went something like this: "Yeah she's been looking for a job for a long while. You know she goes to church something like 6 times a week. I don't know how she finds the time to work. And you know her kids don't go to church at all. They don't listen to her at all and are always in some kind of trouble. I don't know how she would even be able to hold down a job with all that happening in her life."
(Note: my kids are grown and out of the house, and it was at my daughter's suggestion (who works as a supervisor in an office of the same department store in another city) that I even bothered to apply for this job at all.)
To continue: This person passed by the back of my chair as he was leaving the store, and as he was doing so said "I'm sorry ma'am, but I had to do that." Shortly after this incident, I was called to the door of the interview room and told that they did not have an online application in their system for me and that I would have to reapply. However, THEY were the ones who called me and made the appointment for the interview, so they most certainly DID have an application in their system for me or they would not have called me at home to make the appointment in the first place.
This was all the proof I needed to know that, although blacklisting as it has been understood in most instances may or may not actually happen, skits and "street theater" like this DO happen, and can be devastating to a person's efforts to find work and thus affect their well-being and livelihood. This is the ultimate in evil, because if a person can't find work, they will eventually become homeless, something the perps (in their sick way of thinking) take delight in. (Google "street theater" and just see what comes up). The only thing is, this person did not walk in front of me when leaving the store so that I could identify him, but walked behind my chair where I couldn't see him. If I had been able to see him, I probably would have asked him what he was talking about (and the classic perp answer would have been to deny that anything was said at all). These people have been trained in how to conduct themselves so that they cannot be pinpointed or caught in obvious acts of personal sabotage such as this.
The open threat made to me at one workplace was done using something called "Directed Conversation". This is a type of group conversation done in a loud enough way for someone to hear what is being said, yet elements of the conversation will only be understood by a TI to personally pertain to them by either the way the conversation is directed, or words or phrases previously used by a targeted or monitored person (either in a monitored phone or personal conversation) are repeated in such a way to show that the conversation is indeed being directed to a certain targeted individual. Most people are familiar with this being used in a benign and joking way when people who are familiar with one another (like a husband and wife or good friends) mimic a comment one or the other makes and then loudly repeats the information to others in the room knowing that their spouse or friend can hear them--it's done in fun and no harm is meant.
This technique is also used by perps to let TIs know that some tidbit of information has been found out about them (usually by coerced means) or to let TIs know what they can next expect in the way of harassment. Because only the TI is aware of what is happening, others, although they can hear that something is going on, are not tuned into it (except for the fact that it is usually done in a very loud or disruptive manner so that it can be heard across a room for example), so others are most likely not listening and are absorbed in their own activities. The perps will insert any little personal aspects into this usually loud conversation they can to make the TI aware that the conversation is meant for them. But whether the conversation is heard and understood by others or not, the TI will be the one who understands why it is happening. This is not done for fun, but is done to unnerve someone, to again let the TI know that they are under a constant state of harassment, that their personal information and life are being violated for the umpteenth time in a day or week, and that it is not going to stop. If the perps or the group involved in this activity are approached by the TI or even by a sympathetic supervisor to make the disruption stop, the perps will deny that anything was being said about the particular person complaining and make it plain to whoever is listening and observing that the TI (and the supervisor) is either, at the very least, "a bit too touchy" or, at worst ,"totally paranoid."
This makes it almost impossible for TIs to be able to go through supervisory channels to make this kind of thing stop, and TIs who try to handle it alone directly with the perps only leads to an office argument (a disruptive spectacle in the workplace for everyone else to observe and report to management or HR). Most perps who engage in this type of activity are very adept at playing innocent after doing these kinds of things to someone. It just adds to the blame and humiliation being heaped upon someone they choose to target.
I was told in this way at one job that I "would never work again". So is it possible to blacklist a person so that any subsequent job search will come up negative? I used to think not. But I've changed my thoughts on this because of two things:
1. The extent I've personally seen to which these perps will go to ruin a person's life and character (I've seen it done to others as well as myself).
2. And that there is not only positive networking that job searchers engage in to find work, but there is also negative networking that companies engage in to get the supposedly "right" people hired (let's hire this person because they are a friend of a friend of a friend, not because they are a reliable and hard worker--that's how these activities take hold in a company environment, when perps can get their perp associates hired at the same company, and preferably in management positions where hiring decisions are made--I've seen it numerous times). Another scenario experienced at one company recently was when one TI did successfully obtain a job, perps somehow gained access into the doors while employees clocked into the entrance, made bogus 911 calls to police and the fire department reporting bogus illegal and emergency activities, causing the police and other emergency vehicles to arrive only to search the building to find nothing wrong. This kept up for a good couple of weeks. The directors of the company in an effort to quell what was happening employed a security company (of perps) to install further security equipment (at expense to the company) and hire security guards (perps) to watch over the buildings to make sure this did not happen again. This only served to put the perps exactly where they needed to be (inside the company's buildings) to be able to keep their TI under surveillance more easily--another instance of "Problem, Reaction, Solution"--foment a problem, whip up a reaction of outrage from the observers, and provide the solution to the problem (and get paid for it besides).
I'm convinced even more now that it IS possible for blacklisting to occur, because in today's economic environment, if you don't already know someone in the company, your chances of getting hired are slim, and are even slimmer if you've had words on the job with these perps (or their network of people they know in other companies) in defense of your own character when being subjected to the innuendo and gossip they spread.
It's still not known to what extent most companies purposely engage in this kind of thing, but one particular incident has led me to believe it is not only possible but very probable in the case of some TIs.
Here is what happened:
I had applied to a well-known department store as a cashier (something I've had previous experience at). I had given several personal references to the fact that I had done that type of work before. When I arrived at my scheduled interview, I was told that I would be next and was sitting in the waiting room (which was next to one of the cashier checkout areas). While waiting, a very loud conversation between two men (one a male cashier and the other a customer who was "checking out") began taking place. The customer had arrived only a few minutes earlier. Close by was one of the hiring supervisors, so the conversation was loud enough to be heard by everyone in the waiting room. The conversation went something like this: "Yeah she's been looking for a job for a long while. You know she goes to church something like 6 times a week. I don't know how she finds the time to work. And you know her kids don't go to church at all. They don't listen to her at all and are always in some kind of trouble. I don't know how she would even be able to hold down a job with all that happening in her life."
(Note: my kids are grown and out of the house, and it was at my daughter's suggestion (who works as a supervisor in an office of the same department store in another city) that I even bothered to apply for this job at all.)
To continue: This person passed by the back of my chair as he was leaving the store, and as he was doing so said "I'm sorry ma'am, but I had to do that." Shortly after this incident, I was called to the door of the interview room and told that they did not have an online application in their system for me and that I would have to reapply. However, THEY were the ones who called me and made the appointment for the interview, so they most certainly DID have an application in their system for me or they would not have called me at home to make the appointment in the first place.
This was all the proof I needed to know that, although blacklisting as it has been understood in most instances may or may not actually happen, skits and "street theater" like this DO happen, and can be devastating to a person's efforts to find work and thus affect their well-being and livelihood. This is the ultimate in evil, because if a person can't find work, they will eventually become homeless, something the perps (in their sick way of thinking) take delight in. (Google "street theater" and just see what comes up). The only thing is, this person did not walk in front of me when leaving the store so that I could identify him, but walked behind my chair where I couldn't see him. If I had been able to see him, I probably would have asked him what he was talking about (and the classic perp answer would have been to deny that anything was said at all). These people have been trained in how to conduct themselves so that they cannot be pinpointed or caught in obvious acts of personal sabotage such as this.
Saturday, April 10, 2010
About the picture: I found this picture in the November 2009 issue of the Atlantic magazine. It made a profound impression on me when I first saw it. It represents for me the choices (if you can call them that) that TIs (targeted individuals) have when they realize they have been impacted by a phenomenon known as Gangstalking and Workplace/Community Mobbing. Every aspect of life that we hold dear results in the choices shown in this picture. There is virtually no way to escape the invasion to life and privacy that constant stalking and monitoring impose. For me it says, "Come, have a seat, rest a while, but beware what each choice of seating represents." This is what life has become for so many TIs. Our choices(?) are very limited. They must be made within the realm and scope of what 'others' prescribe for us. If we make a search for better more 'comfortable' seating, our efforts are blocked and manipulated for us, no matter how hard we try or how hard we work. If we refuse to associate with the 'right' (wrong for us) people, if we stand out from the madding crowd, if we go our own (and usually more ethical and moral) way of life, these are the choices held out to us--we (TIs) are considered to be outside the now prevailing narrow view of life simply for having our own thoughts, higher morals, and more ethical view of life and people. We are people who would never think to invade another person's space like this, would never associate with people who would do something like this to another person. The very thought repels us; yet there are people who find nothing wrong with imposing their power on others to the point that every aspect of a person's life is fodder for gossip, comment, innuendo and lies. I have actually 'sat' in my 'chair' at work (like in this picture) and have been forced to listen to people speculating about me, my life, my childrens' lives, why we've made the choices we've made, how revolting and stupid people think I and my children are, how I dress and look, what jobs I have held in the past and why I have lost every one of them due to this badgering and, yes, been told in what is known as 'directed conversation' that I would never be able to hold another job again when they get done with me because of their gossip.
Is this torture or just mean-spiritedness? You decide. But when this is done day in and day out nonstop to the point that everyone in the workplace either wants to hear no more of it and blames YOU for having to listen to it, or others who blatantly take part in the abuse themselves because they fear for their OWN jobs and sanity, think how devastating this can be to not only the people observing this happening, but keep in mind, it's the TI (targeted individual) who is the main victim, and most places of work have no rules or procedures in place to deal with this.
This is not just your usual garden-variety workplace harassment--it's the deconstructing of a person's life and livelihood--their ability to provide for themselves and is the most vicious attack a person can experience.
When you see this happening to someone, others simply MUST not tolerate it, because if it can happen to one person, it can and will be happening to you eventually too. Observers of this activity can put a stop to it simply by refusing to become involved in it. Whether this is a constant test of nerves to see how far a person can be pushed is not known. The perpetrators of these workplace and community scenarios won't tell you what they're up to. And one identifying mark of this kind of activity is being told by these perps that the TI (the victim) is being investigated for some nefarious infraction, that they NEED to be watched, and that the implication is that the TI has done something wrong to merit this treatment--nothing could be further from the truth.
These groups, whether government-inspired or just criminally-inspired, have an agenda, but exactly what it is is not known at present. Some writers and researchers believe that this is a testing period to see how many people will go along with a future government where everyone's activities will be monitored eventually--a fascist form of governance that will control not only everyone's activities but everyone's thoughts as well). Most people experiencing this activity are actually law-abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong in life to merit this criminal and threatening monitoring of their private lives. And most of the people targeted in this way have already made it plain that they want no part of this kind of activity, so they are being rooted out and made an example in front of everyone else as to what the powers-that-be will not tolerate in their future world governance. Free-thinking people who will not be coerced to take part in these kinds of things are a threat to their world view. In the battle between this evil and common decency and personal privacy, each individual on both sides are already being forced to draw their own personal line in the sand. It is said that, in matters of decision-making, where choices can mean life or death, there is danger in sitting on the fence--because Satan owns the fence (and obviously the above-pictured chairs too). Where will you decide to sit?
Is this torture or just mean-spiritedness? You decide. But when this is done day in and day out nonstop to the point that everyone in the workplace either wants to hear no more of it and blames YOU for having to listen to it, or others who blatantly take part in the abuse themselves because they fear for their OWN jobs and sanity, think how devastating this can be to not only the people observing this happening, but keep in mind, it's the TI (targeted individual) who is the main victim, and most places of work have no rules or procedures in place to deal with this.
This is not just your usual garden-variety workplace harassment--it's the deconstructing of a person's life and livelihood--their ability to provide for themselves and is the most vicious attack a person can experience.
When you see this happening to someone, others simply MUST not tolerate it, because if it can happen to one person, it can and will be happening to you eventually too. Observers of this activity can put a stop to it simply by refusing to become involved in it. Whether this is a constant test of nerves to see how far a person can be pushed is not known. The perpetrators of these workplace and community scenarios won't tell you what they're up to. And one identifying mark of this kind of activity is being told by these perps that the TI (the victim) is being investigated for some nefarious infraction, that they NEED to be watched, and that the implication is that the TI has done something wrong to merit this treatment--nothing could be further from the truth.
These groups, whether government-inspired or just criminally-inspired, have an agenda, but exactly what it is is not known at present. Some writers and researchers believe that this is a testing period to see how many people will go along with a future government where everyone's activities will be monitored eventually--a fascist form of governance that will control not only everyone's activities but everyone's thoughts as well). Most people experiencing this activity are actually law-abiding citizens who have done nothing wrong in life to merit this criminal and threatening monitoring of their private lives. And most of the people targeted in this way have already made it plain that they want no part of this kind of activity, so they are being rooted out and made an example in front of everyone else as to what the powers-that-be will not tolerate in their future world governance. Free-thinking people who will not be coerced to take part in these kinds of things are a threat to their world view. In the battle between this evil and common decency and personal privacy, each individual on both sides are already being forced to draw their own personal line in the sand. It is said that, in matters of decision-making, where choices can mean life or death, there is danger in sitting on the fence--because Satan owns the fence (and obviously the above-pictured chairs too). Where will you decide to sit?
A Life Under Siege--Realizing Your Life Is Not Your Own
It is said "Life is fleeting--just when we learn the most about how to live, it all ends in a whimper."
It has been intimated to me by those who I have only just met in passing and who barely know me that there exists a phenomenon, experienced in all its shock and horror, that has been shadowing and affecting my life for a long time now, and that it will continue, as "they" (whoever that encompasses) have stated in exact words, "From cradle to grave." This expression has been used in numerous 'directed conversations' in various places where I have been present. "From cradle to grave"--an ominous thought at the very least, when contemplating this particular phenomenon known as Gangstalking and Workplace/Community Mobbing. These words could actually be considered a threat in that particular context--and the sad thing is, it probably is meant that way by these organized groups of dysfunctional, sick, and reprobate people.
The first thought that comes to mind is Why is this happening to me? Why is my mundane little life of such interest to obvious strangers--people I haven't even met before? Where do these people get this private and personal knowledge of my every waking (and sometimes sleeping) hour? How do they know so much about me in particular? What kind of people engage in this kind of thing? Are they paid for their efforts? Or are they just very evil individuals? Or do they have such a deficit in their own lives that my meager life has become their be-all and end-all--voyeurism at its worst?
Is this some military or government experiment, as some surmise from their research into such things? If so, how are we chosen for this unwanted attention? Is service to country an unknown prerequisite for this (once a GI ("government issue") always a GI)? And is participation by perpetrators and targets alike required and mandatory, or does one have the ability to withdraw from this activity if one chooses to?
Answers to these and many other questions regarding this activity have been being unraveled before me as time passes, as I've become more aware of the world around me and how it works. This begs further questions--does the fact that this has been gradually revealed to me indicate a planned scenario brought about by the perps, or does my God want me to know how evil this world really has become? Or both?
Faith in my God is a given. I firmly believe that He is more powerful than any other entity in the universe. I would not be here if it were not for His life-giving qualities, nor would I have survived this long without His help. I feel very blessed to have an ongoing knowledge of Him and His plans and purposes for the future of mankind and for His intervention and help throughout my own life.
My upbringing was very normal. My parents worked hard to raise 4 children down through the last decades of the 20th century. We were brought up to respect authority and to value the contributions that the WWII generation made to our safety and security here in the good 'ole USA. Service to country was a part of our family life, from my father all the way down to me, the youngest of all of us, which included service for and in the Army, Air Force, and in federal government employment and work for federal civil contractors. Little did I know that association with any one of these (much more-so ALL of them) was the beginning of a life of monitoring, manipulation and (more recently) blocking of job opportunity, and mental, emotional, and physical torture.
Yes, you've found another one--another TI (as we're referred to) brought under supposed submission by the so-called Perps--slang terms for the phenomena known as Gangstalking and Workplace/Community Mobbing.
This blog is the beginning of a litany of bizarre activities that only could be financed and implemented by the huge resources of a government gone awry and berserk. Even though I was brought up by very patriotic parents, my own life views have been shaped by other concerns and knowledge--that of my God and the fact that this world is very much bigger than just this country. God created ALL of us--He certainly must care for ALL humans, not just ones who have been lucky(?) enough to have been born in this country.
I have a more encompassing world view than just what my parents taught me. Unfortunately, my remaining Mom (we lost our Dad a few years back) can't escape her limited patriotic view of America being the only place that "God Blesses". Bless her heart (she's 92), and she deserves everything we can give her to make the rest of her life easy. I just hope and pray that God sees her devotion to country as a plus and will be able to use that in the Kingdom he has purposed for the future of the earth and not view it as a liability in her regard--that will be a time for her to realize that it is He that has the right to rule the whole earth, not the corrupted governments and financial elite that control and run everything today.
This knowledge of God's Kingdom ruled by His Son Jesus Christ is what keeps me going and gives me hope (in the face of all of this bizarre activity)--it has been promised to us in scripture. Most people don't know about this, because the clergy and churches have misrepresented this Kingdom to their faithful. It is not just a 'condition of the heart', it is an actual real and viable "government" (see Daniel 2:44 and Isaiah 9:6-7).
Stay tuned with me here...I will be adding more blog as time goes on. I also read others' information about this phenomenon (see badexperiment.com and thehiddenevil.com--both good sources of information.)
It is said "Life is fleeting--just when we learn the most about how to live, it all ends in a whimper."
It has been intimated to me by those who I have only just met in passing and who barely know me that there exists a phenomenon, experienced in all its shock and horror, that has been shadowing and affecting my life for a long time now, and that it will continue, as "they" (whoever that encompasses) have stated in exact words, "From cradle to grave." This expression has been used in numerous 'directed conversations' in various places where I have been present. "From cradle to grave"--an ominous thought at the very least, when contemplating this particular phenomenon known as Gangstalking and Workplace/Community Mobbing. These words could actually be considered a threat in that particular context--and the sad thing is, it probably is meant that way by these organized groups of dysfunctional, sick, and reprobate people.
The first thought that comes to mind is Why is this happening to me? Why is my mundane little life of such interest to obvious strangers--people I haven't even met before? Where do these people get this private and personal knowledge of my every waking (and sometimes sleeping) hour? How do they know so much about me in particular? What kind of people engage in this kind of thing? Are they paid for their efforts? Or are they just very evil individuals? Or do they have such a deficit in their own lives that my meager life has become their be-all and end-all--voyeurism at its worst?
Is this some military or government experiment, as some surmise from their research into such things? If so, how are we chosen for this unwanted attention? Is service to country an unknown prerequisite for this (once a GI ("government issue") always a GI)? And is participation by perpetrators and targets alike required and mandatory, or does one have the ability to withdraw from this activity if one chooses to?
Answers to these and many other questions regarding this activity have been being unraveled before me as time passes, as I've become more aware of the world around me and how it works. This begs further questions--does the fact that this has been gradually revealed to me indicate a planned scenario brought about by the perps, or does my God want me to know how evil this world really has become? Or both?
Faith in my God is a given. I firmly believe that He is more powerful than any other entity in the universe. I would not be here if it were not for His life-giving qualities, nor would I have survived this long without His help. I feel very blessed to have an ongoing knowledge of Him and His plans and purposes for the future of mankind and for His intervention and help throughout my own life.
My upbringing was very normal. My parents worked hard to raise 4 children down through the last decades of the 20th century. We were brought up to respect authority and to value the contributions that the WWII generation made to our safety and security here in the good 'ole USA. Service to country was a part of our family life, from my father all the way down to me, the youngest of all of us, which included service for and in the Army, Air Force, and in federal government employment and work for federal civil contractors. Little did I know that association with any one of these (much more-so ALL of them) was the beginning of a life of monitoring, manipulation and (more recently) blocking of job opportunity, and mental, emotional, and physical torture.
Yes, you've found another one--another TI (as we're referred to) brought under supposed submission by the so-called Perps--slang terms for the phenomena known as Gangstalking and Workplace/Community Mobbing.
This blog is the beginning of a litany of bizarre activities that only could be financed and implemented by the huge resources of a government gone awry and berserk. Even though I was brought up by very patriotic parents, my own life views have been shaped by other concerns and knowledge--that of my God and the fact that this world is very much bigger than just this country. God created ALL of us--He certainly must care for ALL humans, not just ones who have been lucky(?) enough to have been born in this country.
I have a more encompassing world view than just what my parents taught me. Unfortunately, my remaining Mom (we lost our Dad a few years back) can't escape her limited patriotic view of America being the only place that "God Blesses". Bless her heart (she's 92), and she deserves everything we can give her to make the rest of her life easy. I just hope and pray that God sees her devotion to country as a plus and will be able to use that in the Kingdom he has purposed for the future of the earth and not view it as a liability in her regard--that will be a time for her to realize that it is He that has the right to rule the whole earth, not the corrupted governments and financial elite that control and run everything today.
This knowledge of God's Kingdom ruled by His Son Jesus Christ is what keeps me going and gives me hope (in the face of all of this bizarre activity)--it has been promised to us in scripture. Most people don't know about this, because the clergy and churches have misrepresented this Kingdom to their faithful. It is not just a 'condition of the heart', it is an actual real and viable "government" (see Daniel 2:44 and Isaiah 9:6-7).
Stay tuned with me here...I will be adding more blog as time goes on. I also read others' information about this phenomenon (see badexperiment.com and thehiddenevil.com--both good sources of information.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)